Why Divinity Bullies Me

This video is one of FOUR blogtv sessions that Divinity recorded with her audience which included several people leaving comments and asking questions of her. Binhthanvo is part of her audience as well as xxxild and many others. Divinity has erased ALL her blogtv recorded episodes because ALL of them include talking about me. She erased them today when she realized they were discovered. I got a PM from someone in her 'camp' letting me know about them because I think this person realized that Divinity is really a bully who won't leave me alone. I swore to protect my source so don't even ask.

The name of this four part series is 'DB is Beautiful.' I will post the remaining three parts.

Please make sure you read the comments that are scrolling up. At one point someone asks Divinity why she bullies me. She answers that I like it. I don't fucking like it and I'm standing up to you.

This woman has done nothing but harass me, stalk me and continually forces her way into EVERYTHING I do and she is constantly talking about me EVERYW. All of them follow me on Twitter, comment stalk me on YouTube and come to my blog. Guess what? All your ip's are logged.

Remember this is only one of FOUR videos that I recorded. If you want to view it on blip and make it full screen I think you can double click the vid. Otherwise go .

REUPLOADED VIDEO Aug 13th. if still not playing, let me know. For better viewing please use full screen option. Then tell me if Binh and Divinity aren't sucking each others assholes.

Please subscribe to my YouTube channel http://www.youtube.com/user/AuntieDiana1969

My other YouTube account was falsely flagged by people who don't like my opinions and who despise freedom of speech. There is a long list of YouTube users who all think the same way about one issue and I am the minority that does NOT think the way they do. Therefore, they have taken it upon themselves to silence me and punish me for having an alternative viewpoint.



Please subscribe to my backup channel as this will more then likely be my primary channel.



Thank you so much,



Diana



[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="239" caption="Diana"][/caption]

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/8jw4

TheTempleDancer IS Divinity33372: Hopefully Explained in a Way Everyone Can Understand

Here is what Divinity did to create her troll account called TheTempleDancer. She created this troll account to snuggle up to us feminists, especially FistfulofDicks. Divinity used her TempleDancer troll account to PM Fistful and ask lots of questions about him to try and get as much information she could. Here are the PM's that Divinity/TempleDancer sent to Fistful as well as screenshots showing the photos in Divinity's photobucket.

Here's what Divinity did:

She took a picture (the blue Hindu Goddess picture) and made that her avatar on her TempleDancer troll account. The NAME of the troll account comes from ANOTHER picture from another of Divinity's photoalbums which she titled 'TempleDancer.'

Why would ANYONE think this is ANYONE ELSE but Divinity?

The reason I used technical language probably threw a lot of people off and I realize that but in this particular case it forms the undeniable truth that beyond ANY reasonable doubt that the troll account BELONGED to Divinity33372.

Divinity closed her troll account shortly after FistfulofDicks exposed her. Then Divinity went to her photo albums and DELETED all the pictures and then uploaded a bunch of pictures of me and called them all TempleDancer.

This is incredibly simple. None of her faithful herd owned that account. They're just all running around like chickens with their heads cut off trying to do damage control. One of her herd actually posted ON Divinity's troll account (TheTempleDancer) 'I don't know why people are getting so mad at a sock account.' . That shows us that at least a few people KNOW the troll account was INDEED Divinity's. Divinity wanted information from myself and FFOD as seen in the PM's from the link above. That's NOT a sock account. It's a manipulative troll account meant to dig for information from people.

Here's Fistful's Video Exposing Divinity's Troll Account:



BobChaos also made a comment on Fistful's video stating:

Well, perhaps she (Divinity) saw the person (TheTempleDancer troll account) commenting, likd the pic, and then downloaded it into her photobucket as "TempleDancer"...you know, because that was the name of the person she got it from?

Its a nice pic, I got one myself for my collection of goddess imagery.

Problem with that Bob is twofold. First, if Divinity saw TheTempleDancer's avatar and liked it sooo much enough to grab it and stick it on her photobucket, it would be avatar size. It's not. WHY? Because the image on Divinity's photobucket is FULL SIZE, meaning THAT is the origin of the file. The one used on TheTempleDancer account is really Divinity's picture from her album, shrunk to fit the avatar regulations. So no Bob, Divinity didn't LIKE TheTempleDancer avatar and take it to put in her own photobucket.

Second, the filename of the avatar picture was NOT 'TempleDancer.' It was named 'Durga5.' The name TempleDancer came from Divinity's OTHER photo in another one of her photobucket albums. I made a video PROVING this.

The WIKI connection:

When I found out that Divinity named the blue picture 'Durga5' I did a search for it and found it NOWHERE except in Divinity's photobucket account. Then I just searched for 'Durga' and read on Wiki that Durga was a mother Goddess of Hindu Buddhism. Durga is NOT a dancer. In Wiki there is just ONE sentence that says that Hindu's have a holiday where they honour her by dancing.

NEITHER photo from Divinity's album's is located on Wiki. I simply wanted to find out the meaning of the image.

This is critical because if there is NO mention of Durga being a TempleDancer, then the only way someone would call her that is if they knew people danced to her which Divinity has stated that she's into 1) dancing and 2) Buddhism. It was Divinity who called one of her photobucket pictures 'TempleDancer' but it was NOT the blue photo like Bob tried lying that it was. It was a separate photo in a totally different album of Divinity's photobucket.

SO, it was DIVINITY that combined her 'Durga' image and the name of her other image 'TempleDancer' and MADE that troll account.

There is NO OTHER REASONABLE explanation.

I waited to release this video because I wanted to see what Divinity's HERD would say and I was right. They tried to say the blue image WASN'T 'TempleDancer' so how could it be Divinity? They were correct that the image name was indeed 'Durga' but where did they get that from unless Divinity told them that was the name of it? So Divinity's herd took the route I KNEW they would take and it's the reason why in my 2nd video I PURPOSELY left out that fact. I wanted to see them make that argument before I put the final nail in the coffin by letting everyone know that Divinity USED the 'Durga' photo and combined it with the name of her 'TempleDancer' photo to make her TROLL account.



People say to me 'You can't PROVE anything. You can only go by probability.' I've just demonstrated that the probability is 99.9999∞% that Divinity IS the troll account 'TheTempleDancer.'

Divinity is a dancer. Everyone knows that. She's a Buddhist. Everyone knows that. Durga is a Buddhist/Hindu Mother Goddess. Everyone knows that.

Divinity33372 IS the troll TheTempleDancer. Everybody should know that by now and if you don't, you're just as bad a troll and deserve just as much pity.

Other facts:
Divinity closed her 'TheTempleDancer' troll account yesterday when the information broke.
Divinity erased her photos in her photobucket album and replaced them with nasty pics of me.
Divinity is a liar.
Divinity has been exposed.

The Pink Floyd Tells Iran's Ayatollah's to Leave Them Green Rev Kids Alone

A Canadian band consisting of two Iranian brothers called Blurred Vision got permission from Roger Waters of Pink Floyd to release their version of 'Another Brick In The Wall' as support for the Green Revolution in Iran. The line 'Hey! Teacher! Leave those kids alone!' is now 'Hey Ayatollah! Leave Those Kids Alone.' Check out the music video. Click the link.

Amplify’d from www.theatlanticwire.com

Iranians Protest Ayatollahs With Pink Floyd

Canada-based Iranian rock band Blurred Vision has updated the famous Pink Floyd protest anthem "Another Brick in the Wall" to target the theocratic government of Iran. Their otherwise faithful cover changes the song's famous chant to "Hey Ayatollah, leave those kids alone." With the help of Iranian filmmaker Babak Payami, Blurred Vision also produced a music video to channel the song's anti-authoritarian anger against the oppressive Iranian regime. The video, interspliced with footage from the recent "green movement" protests, shows an Iranian woman fleeing security forces and a robed, bearded ayatollah.

In a central London café, the brothers explained how their song has captured the imaginations of young Iranians in a country where rock music is banned. "We've been getting messages from so many Iranians saying they are using the song as a way to voice their protests," said Sohl who, at 35, is the older of the two brothers.

Sepp, 28, added: "A message came through to us last week and when Sohl translated it he had tears running down his cheeks. It was from a fan in Iran and he just kept saying over and over again: 'Keep our voice alive. If you don't then no one will hear us.'"

The young musicians say they sought—and received—the approval of Pink Floyd's Roger Waters to cover the song. "From here on in, that version of the song is yours," he told them.Read more at www.theatlanticwire.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/8fpm

Give Me a Break Peter

Hello my dear friends, pro-exploitation stalkers and the like,

I'm on a small hiatus from my 'normal' activities. You can thank my sinus infection for that. I'm not keeping up with Twitter, YouTube, this blog, my feminist board, my Amplify and other real life stuff. However, I AM doing a lot of reading online.

I came across a story on A360 that I blogged about in this post. I returned to the video and story today and found a comment on the story that made my head hurt more, if that's possible. It was a comment by someone named Peter. The first thing I noticed was the fact that Peter didn't know how to use paragraphs so his post looked like word vomiting. I braved my way through it and discovered that this guy is so full of male privilege and prostitution apologetics it's not even funny.

Basically, Peter stated in so many words (oh so many words) that Craig Newmark, founder of Craigslist, is somehow not really responsible for screening adult ads on his site to make sure there's no child prostitution, adult prostitution and/or sex trafficking. Why isn't Craig responsible? Well, because he doesn't run the company technically. He just works in a part of the company. I don't know about you but that seems like a very apologetic stance. You think it would be really easy for Craig Newmark to ring up the runner of his own company and say 'Look. We really need to monitor the adult section like we claim to do, eh fellas?'

After all, Peter said, Craigslist doesn't have the staff to pour over these ads like they say they do. Yeah, Craigslist says they DO monitor these ads even though it's been clearly shown that  prostitution and trafficking is happening on the site.

Peter then gnashes his teeth at the reporters of A360 because they somehow FORCED Craig Newmark to talk to them on a public sidewalk.

Yes, there is a valid story and discussion about CL. But trapping Craig Newmark out on the sidewalk isn't the way to do it.

Really? What other way is there to do it Peter? I never knew that speaking to someone on a sidewalk constituted trapping. Craig could have easily told the reporter to schedule an appointment for an interview and decline it but he didn't and ultimately showed that his company isn't doing ANYTHING about the Adult section of the site. When reporters asked a local law enforcement authority if they've gotten a SINGLE report from Craigslist to check out an ad for prostitution and/or trafficking the answer was a very firm 'no.'

Peter thinks the cops should be the ones to screen all the ads. The hell with company responsibility right Peter? Oh, and I loved how you told us all how long the problems related to prostitution have been around. That's right, they've been with us FOREVER so why start doing anything about it. Hell, Peter, we can't even have reporters asking questions about it without you whining:

That would do us much more good than the one sided somewhat salacious sort of report I just saw on TV. I trust you guys (AC360 and CNN in general) to try and be fair and even handed and impartial to give us a true picture of the news. Please don't let me and others down.

 Wouldn't want to let you down Peter by exposing the severity of this problem AND by giving Craig an opportunity, which he TOOK, to respond to the reporters questions.

In Peter's mind, it's just not FAIR to question the sex industry and if or when you do it you must have everyone prepare a statement ahead of time so that nobody will feel trapped into giving an honest answer.

Undoubtedly the highlight of the interview with Craig was his achingly long silence when the reporter asked him 'What are you doing to protect these girls?'

Maybe Peter can answer that question?